Sunday, June 19, 2011

rachel weisz 2009

images RACHEL WEISZ photo | Rachel rachel weisz 2009. Rachel Weisz is a Cartier
  • Rachel Weisz is a Cartier



  • ujjwal_p
    10-10 05:45 PM
    If verified, you would end up in eating ham burger.

    Allow me :

    "We get caught laundering money, we're not going to white color resort prison. No, no, no. We're going to Federal pound me in the a** prison" -- Office Space





    wallpaper Rachel Weisz is a Cartier rachel weisz 2009. Rachel Weisz nervous to play
  • Rachel Weisz nervous to play



  • spsrini
    11-18 07:22 AM
    My receipt number is NRC2008065342





    rachel weisz 2009. Rachel Weisz In “Agora” First
  • Rachel Weisz In “Agora” First



  • rockstart
    03-12 11:55 AM
    In theory you are right. But practically Very big corporations/companies have recently started a practice not to hire a person on EAD if I-140 is not clearly approved. Why? Lawyers advise them to do so. I have been hired by very prestigious company recently of course on EAD and first thing they wanted to make a check was on whether I have I-140 approved or not. Secondly they ask if I could submit 3 years audit report for "previous employer". That could make sense to me as it was a clear hint that they wanted to check whether I am coming from good financial based company or not... Why? The reason is that if that would not have been the case then there could be the chance of denying I-140 although it was approved. At least in my network of friends I am the third person who experienced this level of scrutiny before hiring on EAD. The reason is simple. They do not want to hire a guy who can not work at some time of the initial period due to I-140 related problems. So bottom line, I-140 approval is must nowadays for working in big corporations with EAD.


    I am worried about this financial reports. I am not sure many consulting companies will give those to employee who is leaving





    2011 Rachel Weisz nervous to play rachel weisz 2009. Rachel Weisz, Heidi Klum,
  • Rachel Weisz, Heidi Klum,



  • pappu
    03-10 04:11 PM
    I think we should take visa re-capture as high priority once we clear FOIA issue. Whats your opinion?

    We have already made it a priority. This funding drive is happening after many months. I do not recollect having an IV drive in a long time. Thanks for leading the thread and making members active.



    more...


    rachel weisz 2009. Rachel Weisz at the Agora
  • Rachel Weisz at the Agora



  • abhijitp
    07-23 07:07 PM
    My lawyer also submitted my 485 without the employer's letter. She maintained that since I currently work for the petitioning employer, it is not required. She only submitted my pay advice.

    I just asked my lawyer and heard the same thing. Now I am being asked where I got this info from:p Does anyone know the URL to a document that says Employment Letter is a MUST and that your AOS can be denied for not submitting it?





    rachel weisz 2009. Rachel Weisz, 2009, Acrylic on
  • Rachel Weisz, 2009, Acrylic on



  • ultimo
    07-24 08:56 AM
    Is there anyone like my case - concurrently submitting 140 and 485 who submitted WITHOUT current employment letter ?


    my friends lawyer also told the same no need for employment letter . if you have applied for i140



    more...


    rachel weisz 2009. Rachel Weisz
  • Rachel Weisz



  • rpulipati
    09-26 10:56 AM
    FYI, this url has subject of "error in the story":

    http://money.cnn.com/services/speakup/speakup.html

    Thanks





    2010 Rachel Weisz In “Agora” First rachel weisz 2009. RACHEL WEISZ photo | Rachel
  • RACHEL WEISZ photo | Rachel



  • gk_2000
    05-23 03:50 PM
    Definitely much better than a computer operators'. I have high regards for people who work at reputed companies such as MS, ORCL, Apple though. By computer operator i mean people who try to speak english but sound as if they are speaking telugu.

    How about Egyptian accent? How about Russian, Chinese, Mexican, etc?

    Have your REALLY been in USA? How long? Came yesterday????



    more...


    rachel weisz 2009. put Rachel Weisz in here,
  • put Rachel Weisz in here,



  • ItIsNotFunny
    10-15 04:40 PM
    Guys,

    It was just a suggestion. If we together decide after analysis that this is not a good idea, we can divert our energy to something that is more productive.

    By the way, I already got few red flowers (red dots) :)





    hair Rachel Weisz, Heidi Klum, rachel weisz 2009. Rachel Weisz in Valentino
  • Rachel Weisz in Valentino



  • greyhair
    02-12 01:56 PM
    This whole thread is about what Ron Gotcher published. I didn't start this thread. I am only contributing my view that based on available information some things make sense and some dont. The things that do make some sense is wastage of visa numbers in 2010. We have some facts to support the "theory" but not enough.

    What doesn't make sense is Ron's assertion that USCIS wasted 13K EB visas in 2009. Facts simply don't support that.

    Does this help? (Again this is my view... don't want to push it onto others)

    I disagree. This thread is not about some immigration lawyer. This thread is about visa numbers wasted due to USCIS inefficiency. That's what the title of the thread says. Why do I or anybody else care about some immigration lawyer? Why is he/she relevant if its specifically proven with facts that there is no wastage of visa number. You continue to advertise the name of the immigration lawyer. The reason I say this is because in my experience immigration lawyers comment on these issues as if they have direct access to USCIS Director or god. Even after disproving the visa wastage theory with facts you still continue to over analyze immigration body shop instead of discussing the issue. I am just wondering, why would you that? Are you that immigration lawyer or employee of his law firm? Just curious.



    more...


    rachel weisz 2009. Road en el Afi Fest 2009
  • Road en el Afi Fest 2009



  • pappu
    06-14 08:47 AM
    /\/\/





    hot Rachel Weisz at the Agora rachel weisz 2009. rachel-weisz
  • rachel-weisz



  • GreenLantern
    02-21 05:09 PM
    What is all this about LW. Everybody seems to think it's the bomb. Why? Maybe this needs to be it's own thread?



    more...


    house Rachel Weisz for Harper#39;s rachel weisz 2009. d#39;Agora avec Rachel Weisz
  • d#39;Agora avec Rachel Weisz



  • kondur_007
    06-08 06:03 PM
    That "small change" of EB2 China PD is very important. It suggests that there is going to be "Spill over" so EB2 India and China will have to move together to use the unused numbers. A good sign; at least EB1 retrogression does not seem to be likely and there will be some spill over numbers to EB2 India (EB2 china may not benefit much as it had a PD later than that for the rest of the year.

    Scorpion: how can you say "no spill over". EB2ROW is current and so spill over is likely (more likely from EB1 and even to some extent from EB2 ROW)
    Moreover, EB2 ROW remained current meaning that they have not used all their quota; they will not use any spillover numbers and they may even provide spill over numbers to EB2 India and China.





    tattoo Rachel Weisz, 2009, Acrylic on rachel weisz 2009. Rachel WEISZ
  • Rachel WEISZ



  • meridiani.planum
    03-04 01:24 PM
    I am expectin WSJ to pay a visit. So I changed the first message.

    perhaps you want to make it even simpler?

    - Remove all the LC/I-140 details, just say that we are at the last stage of a long and arduous process, and are stuck waiting because of very small immigration quota's that were set decades ago which are completely out of line with real supply-demand for the size of todays high-tech workforce. In addition USCIS inefficiency has resulted in them not utilizing even this tiny quota fully, in the past few years.
    - instead of EAD and validity just say getting a mortage is a lot easier if your immigration status is permanent. In this final stage of immigration most of us have work authorization that needs to be renewed every year, and mortgage companies dont accept that.

    copy paste the suggested fixes there (or add a link to the administrative fixes campaign post)



    more...


    pictures Rachel Weisz rachel weisz 2009. Rachel Weisz is absolutely the
  • Rachel Weisz is absolutely the



  • suresh.emails
    01-21 02:41 PM
    No more crossing into USA just based on saying you are a Citizen (oral declaration).

    Starting from January 31, 2008 (two weeks from now), all citizens must carry passport or other kinds of acceptable ID's to enter into US border. This is also applicable US and Canadian citizen.

    Following are acceptable documents/ID's for US/Canada citizens ages 19 and older.

    1. USA, Canada passports
    2. US passport card (available in the spring)
    3. Trusted traveler card such as NEXUS, SENTRI or FAST
    4. Secure driver's license
    5. US military ID
    6. US Merchant Mariner document
    7. One of several IDs issued to Native Americans

    So, proof of citizenship will be required for entry.

    As usual, all other citizen must carry all required documents.

    Source: USA Today January 18, 2008 news paper 3A page.





    dresses rachel-weisz rachel weisz 2009. actress Rachel Weisz has
  • actress Rachel Weisz has



  • singhsa3
    08-13 03:57 PM
    I think thats AC21 recapture thing...
    From sept visa bulletin http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4328.html section E.



    We have 22704 FB visa overflow to EB for year 2008.



    more...


    makeup put Rachel Weisz in here, rachel weisz 2009. Rachel Weisz for Harper#39;s
  • Rachel Weisz for Harper#39;s



  • johnamit
    06-13 10:19 AM
    I have seen this same footage months ago and to it don't look real, its cooked. Some facts there are just un-digestible like the gora guy will take job of a waiter immediately after working as senior exec. cmon market is not that bad unless he don't know anything else and don't have ability to get other similar job, then he should be fired anyways. and then that carlos guy, his dress up don't seems convincing that other execs will give me good response after presentation. its all cooked... showing 600k+ numbers are all bogus.

    Please check this out...might give you guys some hope and laughter :)
    immigration_the_human_cost (http://www.theonion.com/content/video/immigration_the_human_cost)





    girlfriend Rachel WEISZ rachel weisz 2009. RACHEL WEISZ photo | Rachel
  • RACHEL WEISZ photo | Rachel



  • onemorecame
    10-05 12:50 PM
    My Attorney is going to reply today, let�s hope for good.


    Onemorecame





    hairstyles Road en el Afi Fest 2009 rachel weisz 2009. Rachel Weisz
  • Rachel Weisz



  • indianindian2006
    07-14 06:09 PM
    This is aboslutly incorrect. Dont spread false information.

    Here is the Q&A in USCIS memo abot changing employer before 180 days

    Question 10. Should service centers or district offices deny portability cases on the sole basis that the alien has left his or her employment with the I-140 petitioner prior to the I-485 application pending for 180 days?

    Answer: No. The basis for adjustment is not actual (current) employment but prospective employment. Since there is no requirement that the alien have ever been employed by the petitioner while the I-140 and/or I-485 was pending, the fact that an alien left the I-140 petitioner before the I-485 has been pending 180 days will not necessarily render the alien ineligible to port. However, in all cases an offer of employment must have been bona fide. This means that, as of the time the I-140 was filed and at the time of filing the I-485 if not filed concurrently, the I-140 petitioner must have had the intent to employ the beneficiary, and the alien must have intended to undertake the employment, upon adjustment. Adjudicators should not presume absence of such intent and may take the I-140 and supporting documents themselves as prima facie evidence of such intent, but in appropriate cases additional evidence or investigation may be appropriate

    You are correct but his case could be that his employer cancelled his 140 which could damage his case more than the use of AC21 to change employers.





    jetflyer
    08-10 12:28 PM
    http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/statistics/publications/LPR07.shtm

    see table 6 in that link

    Thanks VDLRAO.
    I looked at 2008 data from same source and surprised to see 70046 approvals for 2008-EB2.
    Does that means there are not many old cases in line ahead of us?

    Source link: DHS | Yearbook of Immigration Statistics: 2008 (http://www.dhs.gov/files/statistics/publications/LPR08.shtm)

    check for table 6





    ckichannagari
    06-11 10:57 AM
    just sent again after modified contents..



    No comments:

    Post a Comment